Hypnotism: Its History, Practice and Theory |
||
|
act without repeated hypnotization. It is also true that many would refuse to
commit a crime even after a long hypnotic training (Delbceuf). If Kahler really
thought that imperative ideas produced by hypnotic suggestion resemble impulsive
ideas of pathological origin, particularly on account of their violence, we
cannot agree with his conclusion that post-hypnotic imperative ideas never lead
to acts of violence, since pathological impulsive ideas do sometimes lead to
such acts. According to Gilles de la Tourette we are specially protected from
such crimes being committed by the fact that a criminal who suggested any such
offence would be no more protected from discovery than if he committed the crime
himself. On the other hand, Forel insists that the greatest danger is that at
the time the criminal suggestion is made the subject may be induced to believe
that he is acting on his own initiative, and is unaware of any constraint. Still,
as most investigators assume, only people whose general moral character renders
them capable of committing criminal acts could be influenced in this way. Forel,
however, does not admit this unconditionally. He made various experiments. for
the purpose of enlightening a lawyer named Hofelt, who
THE LEGAL ASPECTS OF HYPNOTISM. 417 |
|
|
More cool stuff from www.hypnosisschool.org: © 2012 |
||