Hypnotism: Its History, Practice and Theory |
||
|
used for immoral purposes. But Schrenck-Notzing came to the conclusion that
it was a case of retro-active falsification of the memory, or perhaps even of
conscious simulation. Certainly we must exercise great care before assuming
that there is conscious lying on the part of the accuser in such a case. The
confused notions of hypnosis and suggestion that are still so prevalent make
it quite possible for a woman to mistake intense sexual excitement for hypnosis,
and this appears all the more likely when we come to consider that sexual excitement,
when artificially aroused, renders a girl quite as incapable of offering resistance
as hypnosis or suggestion. Of course, from the human point of view we may be
charitably inclined in such cases, but as experts we must rigidly distinguish
between them and hypnoses. Czynski's case, tried at Munich in December 5894,
belongs here. Czynski, who had studied hypnosis and animal magnetism, made the
acquaintance of Baroness X. He was charged with seducing her by means of post-hypnotic
suggestion. This was followed by a sham marriage ceremony performed by one of
his acquaintances, a man named Wartalsky. The jury acquitted Czynski of having
committed an offence against morality, but he was condemned to three years'
imprisonment for his con-duct in respect of the mock marriage. The opinions
expressed by the experts engaged in the case were somewhat at variance. Grashey
took up the standpoint that the baroness's love was not normal, but hypnotic;
her love was aroused by Czynski's declaration of love, which he made while she
was in hypnosis. Although Schrenck-Notzing and Preyer expressed the same view,
I think that Hirt was right in ascribing very little im-
THE LEGAL ASPECTS OF HYPNOTISM. 407 |
|
|
More cool stuff from www.hypnosisschool.org: © 2012 |
||