Hypnotism: Its History, Practice and Theory |
||
|
Nancy. Certainly the address was not at all favourably received, and two men,
who were obviously only acquainted with Charcot's investigation and not with
those of the Nancy school, opposed me. Ewald objected altogether to such a method
of treatment being designated medical, and Mendel attacked hypnosis on account
of its manifold dangers. As a natural consequence an exaggerated mistrust of
hypnosis was engendered, and only gave way when a more objective conception
of the question made itself felt. This occurred when Fore], who had been giving
instruction in hypnosis in Switzerland in connection with the Nancy school,
insisted on the importance of the subject, and at the same time especially denounced
the manner in which Ewald and Mendel sought to settle the question. A really stirring activity now set in in Germany also. The importance of suggestion for hypnosis was recognized; and many physicians, following the example of the Nancy schcol, commenced therapeutic experiments with hypnosis in Germany. Among them may be named Sperling, Nonne, Michael, Hess. I must further especially mention Schrenck-Notzing, who was one of the very first pronounced advocates for the therapeutical application of hypnosis; also Hosslin and Baierlacher, who discovered the reaction of degeneration, but who unfortunately died shortly after turning his attention to hypnotism. Among those who, in Germany, either employed or recommended the therapeutical application of suggestion may also be mentioned Corval, Schuster, Hirt, Ad. Barth, Briigelmann, Hecker, Max Hirsch, Scholz,Gerster, Stein, Seif, Tatzel, Stadelmann, Placzek, Gumpertz, Delius, Steiner, Schutze, Herzberg, Sji stri m, Steg- 24 HYPNOTISM. |
|
|
More cool stuff from www.hypnosisschool.org: © 2012 |
||