Hypnotism: Its History, Practice and Theory |
||
|
that excitation of the neighbouring element lowers its own excitability, while
a condition of inhibition favours discharge of energy. This is the neurodynamic
reaction. At the same time, according to Wundt, there is a vasomotor reaction,
for the blood contents and functions of the organs stand in such a relationship
to one another that increase of function produces increased flow of blood, decrease
of function, depression of the blood flow. Wundt further argues that neurodynamic
compensation favours vasomotor compensation and vice versa, and seeks in this
way to explain the phenomena of hypnosis by viewing the chief symptoms from
this standpoint. He then refers to the centre for apperception, which, hypothetically,
he regards as the substratum of the process of apperception. He believes that
we have here an essential difference between dreaming and hypnosis, though he
does not ascribe absolute importance to this difference. Certain phenomena of
inhibition of the processes of the will and the attention are common to both,
also a tendency to increased excitability of the sensory centres leading to
hallucinatory interpretation of sense-impressions. But there are distinguishing
characteristics; attention is only partially altered by suggestion in hypnosis,
but the inhibition of the will in sleep affects both apperceptive and motor
processes. It is from this psychological difference that Wundt develops his
physiological theory. In dreams those central regions which are associated with
the process of apperception are more or less in a state of inhibition, and
THE THEORY OF HYPNOTISM. 277 |
|
|
More cool stuff from www.hypnosisschool.org: © 2012 |
||